The Wright Firm's Weblog

Weird Lawsuit Chicago Style: Injured by a Corpse

An Illinois court recently upheld a woman’s right to sue the estate of a dead teenager.  The woman was purportedly injured by the flying dismembered body part(s) of the teen who was hit by an Amtrak train.  The plaintiff sustained a broken leg and wrist and injured shoulder after being knocked down by a sizable chunk of teen’s body.

While the court noted that case law on “flying bodies” is sparse, it stated that it was “reasonably foreseeable” that the high speed train would kill the teen and hurl his remains into the crowd on the train platform. Allegedly, 18 year old Hiroyuki Joho was running across a set of tracks to catch an inbound commuter train, when he was struck and killed by an Amtrak train going about 70 mph in the other direction.

While it is true that is Texas you can under certain circumstance sue the estate of a deceased person for negligence, there is no telling how a Texas judge would rule under these circumstances.

Have you been injured in an accident?  The Wright Firm may be able to help you!  Attorney Andrew Sher, “of counsel” to The Wright Firm, handles a variety of personal injury cases.  Give our office a call at (972) 353-4600 or check us out on the web at www.thewrightlawyers.com. 

Original Chicago Tribune article can be found here: http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-12-29/news/ct-met-train-fatality-suit-20111229_1_amtrak-train-high-speed-train-metra-train

 

Can a divorce be bad for business?

Social media outlets have been ablaze with news of Kim Kardashian filing for divorce after a mere 72 days of wedded “bliss”.  Many are now questioning whether the $10 million wedding-turned-immediate-divorce will generate backlash that will hurt the Kardashian brand.  Though there is much hate mail flying around the Twitter-verse and wedding vendors are furious, USA today reports that Kim K’s brand is safe.  The experts interviewed all came to the same conclusion – Kim’s divorce will just be a blip on her business radar, and the publicity surrounding it could actually be good for revenues.

For those of us without our own reality show, divorce can have a bigger impact on business.  In a Texas divorce if you own an interest in a business, that ownership interest can be considered a community asset; meaning, it could go into the “pot” of assets that the court divides in your divorce.  Divorce can affect your business in other ways as well.  If you and your spouse worked together, divorce obviously will put a huge strain on that working relationship.  If your business depends on “goodwill” in the community, the mud-slinging involved in a contentious divorce can be damaging to both your business and personal reputation.

Are you worried about how a divorce will affect your business?  The Wright Firm is here to help answer your questions!  Give us a call at (972) 353-4600 or check us out on the web at www.thewrightlawyers.com.

Original USA Today story can be found here:  http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/story/2011-11-01/kim-kardashian-kris-humphries-divorce/51020246/1

In case you’re curious where Kim Kardashian falls in the ranks of shortest celebrity marriage, check out this info graphic from the Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/31/shortest-celebrity-marriages_n_1068180.html?1320097823

 

Chasing Ambulances?

We’ve heard lawyers referred to as “ambulance chasers” before, but there is a technical term for the practice of using unethical methods to chase down potential clients:  it’s called Barratry and it’s illegal.  The full definition of barratry under Texas law is found in the Texas Penal Code section 38.12.  However, the bottom line is that an attorney is forbidden by law from soliciting employment.  Put another way, the client can to come to the attorney and hire him, but the attorney cannot seek out a client and beg to be hired.  For example, a personal injury attorney cannot just show up in someone’s hospital room uninvited and try to sign the injured person up as a client.

 A new law passed this legislative session is strengthening the existing rules against barratry and helping individuals who sue attorneys who commit barratry.  Under the new Texas Government Code section 82.0651, a person who was solicited by an attorney in violation of barratry laws, but who did not sign a contract with that attorney can sue the attorney and recover:  1) $10,000.00, 2) any actual damages, and 3) the attorney fees incurred in suing the attorney who engaged in barratry.  Similar remedies are available for persons who DID sign a contract with the offending attorney.

Lawyers across the state are taking notice of the new laws.  Many are taking steps to be extremely careful in tracking how clients come to their firm.  A full-page advertisement has even been posted in the Texas Bar Journal magazine warning that, “The legislature just made it a lot more dicey to chase ambulances in Texas.”

For full article from the Dallas Bar Association click here: http://www.dallasbar.org/content/bill-creates-new-civil-remedies-barratry

For the Texas Lawyer site (by Law.com) article click here: http://www.law.com/jsp/tx/PubArticleTX.jsp?id=1202513923807&slreturn=1&hbxlogin=1

If you seek information about your Texas legal case, contact The Wright Firm, L.L.P. at 972-353-4600 or visit our website at www.thewrightlawyers.com . 

 

Denton Personal Injury Lawyer: Denton Apartment Railing Collapses: Three Hurt

WFAA was reporting Saturday, September 3, 2011 that Denton police said that three people were injured early Saturday morning when a third-floor railing came loose at an apartment complex that caters to college students.

WFAA reported that the three men were standing outside smoking when “the balcony fell off the building” at the Grove Apartments at 701 Ft. Worth Drive, around 3:15 a.m.  The condition of the individuals is unknown. The actual cause of the incident is still under investigation. 

 

Denton is home to The University of North Texas.   As a college town, there are numerous apartments that provide off-campus housing for students.  Students need to be reminded that they have rights which are no different than any other citizen.  Students should realize that they have rights such as:

 

Health, Safety and Security

Texas law provides that landlords guarantee a habitable unit for tenants to live in. Tenants have the right to live under safe conditions free of health hazards. Tenants have the right to security devices such as keyed exterior locks, door viewers and working smoke detectors. They also have the right to live in the property free of harassment and violence from other tenants. Landlord must install the following security devices: window latches, doorknob lock or keyed deadbolts, sliding door pin locks, sliding door handle latches, or sliding door security bars and keyless bolting device (that only can be locked and unlocked from the inside).

Right to Repairs

Tenants also have the right to request the repair or replacement of items which threaten their right to safe, inhabitable conditions. Tenants have the right to make repairs on their own, for which the landlord is still financially responsible, if the damage resulted from normal wear and tear or was not the fault of the tenant or their guest.

The full store can be read at the link below:

 http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/Denton-apartment-balcony-collapses-three-hurt-129186483.html 

 

For information regarding personal injury law contact The Denton County law firm of The Wright Firm, L.L.P. at 972-353-4600 or visit our website at www.thewrightlawyers.com.  Our phones are answered 24 hours a day.  The Wright Firm, L.L.P. has offices in Dallas, Denton, and Lewisville, Texas.  Partners of the firm are both graduates of The University of North Texas. 

 

Pole Tax?

The Texas Supreme Court upheld a $5 per patron fee requirement on establishments that provide both nude dancing entertainment and serve alcohol.  The so-called “Pole Tax” was challenged on First Amendment freedom of expression grounds.  The idea being that a forcing nude dancing clubs to pay this tax is a restriction on the dancers’ freedom to express themselves via gyrating naked.

The Texas high court was careful to make the distinction that the tax only applies to establishments that offer alcohol. In its opinion, the Court stated that the tax is not directed at the dancing itself, but rather at the “secondary effects” of naked dancing and alcohol consumption combined.

For the Court’s full opinion* click here: http://alt.coxnewsweb.com/shared-blogs/austin/courts/upload/2011/08/supreme_court_upholds_texas_po/pole%20tax%20opinion.pdf

*in case you’re curious – take a look at footnote 4 on page 2  for the definition of “nude” – it takes a lot less nakedness to be “nude” than you might think.

For the original ABA Journal article click here: http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/texas_supreme_court_upholds_nude_dancing_customer_fee

For more information about Texas law contact The Wright Firm, L.L.P. at 972-353-4600 or visit our website at www.thewrightlawyers.com.  

Beer for World Peace!

In honor of National Beer Day, the Wright Firm presents this story of beer and the law:

Naming rights in the liquor industry are a huge legal issue.  Everyone wants their microbrew’s name to be as unique and have just as much flavor as the beer itself.  Recently however, two different microbrews found themselves BOTH using the name “Salvation” for their product.  Prime fodder for an infringement lawsuit, right?

Rather than sue, the brewers actually contacted each other and attempted to work out a solution themselves.  What resulted was a new product that blended the two potentially infringing beers into a hybrid called “Collaboration Not Litigation Ale.” 

Now attorneys in the business warn that this could cause problems for the brewers in the future, as the lack of aggressive protection of a trade name can make a beer company lose value.  The brewers claim not to be worried as they have no intention of every selling their businesses. 

While beer can bring people together, if you love it too much it can get you into legal trouble in the form of DWI, divorce, or possibly even bankruptcy.  If you’ve drunk yourself into a tight spot, The Wright Firm is here to help!  Give us a call at (972) 353-4600 or check us out on the web at www.thewrightfirm.com.  And please – Always drink responsibly!

Original article from the American Bar (not THAT kind of bar…) Association Journal can be found here:  http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/bottoms_up_litigation_down_microbrewers_forsake_litigation_opt_for_collabor/

 

Wacky Marriage Laws

Clients complain to me all the time about how strange Texas Family Law is.  Well, to all of those critics, I say take a look at the following weird marriage laws from other U.S. States:

1. Montana is the only state in America where BOTH the bride and the groom can use a “proxy” to stand in for them if they cannot be present at their own wedding.  (Okay, to be fair – Texas does permit ONE prospective spouse to appear by proxy.  See Texas Family Code Section 2.203)
2. For a few months, Arkansas law permitted ANYONE under 18 (even infants) to marry if they had parental consent.  The state legislators forgot to put in an age minimum! This goof was corrected in April 2008, and we will assume all toddler marriages have since been annulled.
3. I double-dare you to divorce me!  In Delaware an official legal ground for annulment is that you got married “because of a jest or dare.”
4. In Kentucky it is illegal to marry the same person 4 times.  You can get married to and divorced from different people, however, as many times as you want.
5. Massachusetts has a 2 unusual marriage laws to its credit:
   1. A married couple may not sleep in the nude in a rented room (what pervy innkeeper keeps an eye on this?); and
   2. In Truro, MA - A groom-to-be must prove his manliness by hunting and killing either 6 blackbirds or 3 crows.  Nothing more manly than a bird hunter!
   3. In South Carolina, it is a misdemeanor for a man over the age of 16 to propose marriage and not “mean it.”  But, I suppose if someone dared the guy to propose, he could always run to Delaware for an annulment…
   4. In Wichita, Kansas, a woman cannot use her husband’s mistreatment of her mother as a ground for divorce.  Good news for guys who hate their mother-in-law.
   5. Keep those lips to yourself!  In Hartford, Connecticut, it is illegal for married couples to kiss on Sunday.
   6. In New Orleans, Louisiana, it is against the law for a palm reader, fortune teller, or other “mystic” to perform a wedding ceremony.  Are they afraid the medium is going to tip off the couple about their future marital problems?

Have questions about our (much more normal!) Texas laws on marriage and divorce?  Give The Wright Firm a call at (972) 353-4600 or check us out on the web at www.thewrightlawyers.com!

Original MSN story can be found here: http://glo.msn.com/relationships/10-obscure-marriage-laws-5450.gallery?gt1=49006

 

Packing Heat on a Texas Campus!

A bill is up for vote in the Texas House of Representatives that would allow students at Texas universities to carry concealed handguns on campus.  The law is directed at situations like the Virginia Tech mass shooting, with the idea being that students who are armed would be better able to defend themselves.  The state Senate passed a similar bill in 2009 and is expected to pass the current bill as well.

Texas would be the second state (Utah was first) to allow concealed handguns on all college campuses.  Texas is uniquely situated for legislation like this.  First, Texas has 38 public universities with over half a million students, so the law would touch a huge number of individuals.  Secondly, Texas has a generally very gun-friendly culture, which would help a law of this nature gain general acceptance.

Under current Texas law, a person who is 21 years of age or older may obtain a concealed handgun license if he or she passes both a training course and a background check.  However, even with the license, guns are currently prohibited in dorms, buildings and other areas of the grounds on college campuses.  So, the question is – do we really want college students packing heat to class?

For more information on Texas laws contact The Wright Firm, L.L.P. at 972-353-4600 or visit our website at www.thewrightlawyers.com. 

This Site is a public resource for general information about The Wright Firm, L.L.P. and Texas Law.  Nothing in this Site should be construed by you as a source of legal advice. You should not rely or act upon the contents of this Site without seeking advice from your own attorney. Use and access to this Site or any materials or information provided on this Site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and The Wright Firm, L.L.P. or any of its attorneys,  nor is this Site a substitute for legal advice. Any information submitted by you by The Wright Firm, L.L.P. or its attorneys via this Site, an email, or any form of social media communication will not be considered an attorney-client communication or otherwise be treated as confidential or privileged in the absence of an executed Engagement Agreement between you and The Wright Firm, L.L.P. or its attorneys.

 

 

 

Seriously, you may have to insure a twenty pound male dog in Texas?

State Rep. Ruth Jones McClendon (D-San Antonio) has introduced a bill that would require any Texan who owns a male dog which weighs 20 pounds or more and is not neutered to have an insurance policy covering injuries or damage caused by that dog when it is off the leash or out of the dog's yard, San Antionio’s 1200 WOAI Michael Board reports.1200 WOAI Dog Insurance Article

Apparently the bill would only apply if dogs are off their lease and not on their own property.  The article explains that the U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance called it 'ridiculous.'

"Why male dogs only?" Alliance spokesman Jeremy Rice asked.  "Why dogs 20 pounds and not 17? Why only unaltered dogs?" 

So what about the owner who fails to secure their dog?  The owner who fails to have their dog neutered?  Is it really necessary to require all dog owners who fit this category to provide insurance?   Does State Rep. McClendon assume that only dogs that are over 20 pounds dangerous? Isn’t it really the dog owner’s responsibility? We might as well have insurance on humans for the injuries or damage caused by the human? Should we limit this insurance to males over 200 pounds who have not been neutered?   What do you think?

If you have questions about Texas law, contact The Wright Firm, L.L.P. at 972-353-4600 or visit our website at www.thewrightlawyers.com.  Reading this article does not create an attorney-client relationship.  Each case is different so be sure to consult with an attorney.